<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: My tweet was in the paper! Wait&#8230; am I okay with that?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://djkelly.ca/2009/09/my-tweet-was-in-the-paper-wait-am-i-okay-with-that/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://djkelly.ca/2009/09/my-tweet-was-in-the-paper-wait-am-i-okay-with-that/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 May 2012 04:32:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lars</title>
		<link>http://djkelly.ca/2009/09/my-tweet-was-in-the-paper-wait-am-i-okay-with-that/#comment-427</link>
		<dc:creator>Lars</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 03:19:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://djkelly.ca/?p=239#comment-427</guid>
		<description>As with anything that a writer writes, it is immediately copyrighted as soon as the ink hits the page.  If a news source or other widespread publishing entity has reprinted copyrighted material, permission must be obtained from the author.  The idea that anything written on Twitter or blog posts is in the public domain and fit to be used by anybody for any purpose goes against copyright law unless the author has given his rights away.  Darren says that Metro will continue to reprint tweets as long as it adds value to readers.  Metro is running a for-profit business.  If you are using others&#039; writings to increase the value to your readers then you should compensate the author with an agreed upon price (whatever that may be).  This shouldn&#039;t even be a debate!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As with anything that a writer writes, it is immediately copyrighted as soon as the ink hits the page.  If a news source or other widespread publishing entity has reprinted copyrighted material, permission must be obtained from the author.  The idea that anything written on Twitter or blog posts is in the public domain and fit to be used by anybody for any purpose goes against copyright law unless the author has given his rights away.  Darren says that Metro will continue to reprint tweets as long as it adds value to readers.  Metro is running a for-profit business.  If you are using others&#8217; writings to increase the value to your readers then you should compensate the author with an agreed upon price (whatever that may be).  This shouldn&#8217;t even be a debate!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lars</title>
		<link>http://djkelly.ca/2009/09/my-tweet-was-in-the-paper-wait-am-i-okay-with-that/#comment-763</link>
		<dc:creator>Lars</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 03:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://djkelly.ca/?p=239#comment-763</guid>
		<description>As with anything that a writer writes, it is immediately copyrighted as soon as the ink hits the page.  If a news source or other widespread publishing entity has reprinted copyrighted material, permission must be obtained from the author.  The idea that anything written on Twitter or blog posts is in the public domain and fit to be used by anybody for any purpose goes against copyright law unless the author has given his rights away.  Darren says that Metro will continue to reprint tweets as long as it adds value to readers.  Metro is running a for-profit business.  If you are using others&#039; writings to increase the value to your readers then you should compensate the author with an agreed upon price (whatever that may be).  This shouldn&#039;t even be a debate!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As with anything that a writer writes, it is immediately copyrighted as soon as the ink hits the page.  If a news source or other widespread publishing entity has reprinted copyrighted material, permission must be obtained from the author.  The idea that anything written on Twitter or blog posts is in the public domain and fit to be used by anybody for any purpose goes against copyright law unless the author has given his rights away.  Darren says that Metro will continue to reprint tweets as long as it adds value to readers.  Metro is running a for-profit business.  If you are using others&#8217; writings to increase the value to your readers then you should compensate the author with an agreed upon price (whatever that may be).  This shouldn&#8217;t even be a debate!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul '140' Hughes</title>
		<link>http://djkelly.ca/2009/09/my-tweet-was-in-the-paper-wait-am-i-okay-with-that/#comment-398</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul '140' Hughes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 22:12:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://djkelly.ca/?p=239#comment-398</guid>
		<description>Metro used 1 of my tweets today &amp; they credited my tweet handle. I&#039;m okay with them using the tweet, not that it matters, although I do understand ur concerns... I think it is rather hip &amp; savvy for Metro to glean #yyc &amp; #calgary. 
Thx 4 raising the issue @DJkelly... 
@paulinate</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Metro used 1 of my tweets today &amp; they credited my tweet handle. I&#8217;m okay with them using the tweet, not that it matters, although I do understand ur concerns&#8230; I think it is rather hip &amp; savvy for Metro to glean #yyc &amp; #calgary.<br />
Thx 4 raising the issue @DJkelly&#8230;<br />
@paulinate</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul '140' Hughes</title>
		<link>http://djkelly.ca/2009/09/my-tweet-was-in-the-paper-wait-am-i-okay-with-that/#comment-762</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul '140' Hughes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 22:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://djkelly.ca/?p=239#comment-762</guid>
		<description>Metro used 1 of my tweets today &amp; they credited my tweet handle. I&#039;m okay with them using the tweet, not that it matters, although I do understand ur concerns... I think it is rather hip &amp; savvy for Metro to glean #yyc &amp; #calgary. 
Thx 4 raising the issue @DJkelly... 
@paulinate</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Metro used 1 of my tweets today &amp; they credited my tweet handle. I&#8217;m okay with them using the tweet, not that it matters, although I do understand ur concerns&#8230; I think it is rather hip &amp; savvy for Metro to glean #yyc &amp; #calgary.<br />
Thx 4 raising the issue @DJkelly&#8230;<br />
@paulinate</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terry Rock</title>
		<link>http://djkelly.ca/2009/09/my-tweet-was-in-the-paper-wait-am-i-okay-with-that/#comment-397</link>
		<dc:creator>Terry Rock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 18:48:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://djkelly.ca/?p=239#comment-397</guid>
		<description>Good discussion, but this is an open and shut case of fair use.

I sure hope that our copyright regime allows this kind of use.  When I published my dissertation, I was hoping like heck people would quote passages from it, and credit me.  In publishing, citation is how you &quot;own&quot; content IMO.

If it wasn&#039;t credited, then there&#039;s a problem.  There is, I guess, grey area due to the fact that they used the &quot;entire&quot; &quot;work&quot; without notification.  Hence the need to reform copyright to fit the digital age.

In the end, if you publish, you should expect your work to be re-used, built upon AND that you would get the credit.  Twitter is publishing.

T</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good discussion, but this is an open and shut case of fair use.</p>
<p>I sure hope that our copyright regime allows this kind of use.  When I published my dissertation, I was hoping like heck people would quote passages from it, and credit me.  In publishing, citation is how you &#8220;own&#8221; content IMO.</p>
<p>If it wasn&#8217;t credited, then there&#8217;s a problem.  There is, I guess, grey area due to the fact that they used the &#8220;entire&#8221; &#8220;work&#8221; without notification.  Hence the need to reform copyright to fit the digital age.</p>
<p>In the end, if you publish, you should expect your work to be re-used, built upon AND that you would get the credit.  Twitter is publishing.</p>
<p>T</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terry Rock</title>
		<link>http://djkelly.ca/2009/09/my-tweet-was-in-the-paper-wait-am-i-okay-with-that/#comment-761</link>
		<dc:creator>Terry Rock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 18:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://djkelly.ca/?p=239#comment-761</guid>
		<description>Good discussion, but this is an open and shut case of fair use.

I sure hope that our copyright regime allows this kind of use.  When I published my dissertation, I was hoping like heck people would quote passages from it, and credit me.  In publishing, citation is how you &quot;own&quot; content IMO.

If it wasn&#039;t credited, then there&#039;s a problem.  There is, I guess, grey area due to the fact that they used the &quot;entire&quot; &quot;work&quot; without notification.  Hence the need to reform copyright to fit the digital age.

In the end, if you publish, you should expect your work to be re-used, built upon AND that you would get the credit.  Twitter is publishing.

T</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good discussion, but this is an open and shut case of fair use.</p>
<p>I sure hope that our copyright regime allows this kind of use.  When I published my dissertation, I was hoping like heck people would quote passages from it, and credit me.  In publishing, citation is how you &#8220;own&#8221; content IMO.</p>
<p>If it wasn&#8217;t credited, then there&#8217;s a problem.  There is, I guess, grey area due to the fact that they used the &#8220;entire&#8221; &#8220;work&#8221; without notification.  Hence the need to reform copyright to fit the digital age.</p>
<p>In the end, if you publish, you should expect your work to be re-used, built upon AND that you would get the credit.  Twitter is publishing.</p>
<p>T</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darren Krause</title>
		<link>http://djkelly.ca/2009/09/my-tweet-was-in-the-paper-wait-am-i-okay-with-that/#comment-396</link>
		<dc:creator>Darren Krause</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 18:13:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://djkelly.ca/?p=239#comment-396</guid>
		<description>Great post DJ.  Certainly brings the issue to the forefront, which is always good for finding our bearings on topics like this.

First I just want to say our intent was to reach out and engage Calgarians on Twitter, be relevant and forward-thinking - and give our readers a voice, which they so often don&#039;t have in today&#039;s media.  We wanted to know what Calgarians were tweeting about - especially the &#039;hot&#039; water cooler discussions going on - and then let other Calgarians know what the Twittersphere in Calgary was on to.

I know you understand there is no malice involved in re-printing in the paper - we&#039;re certainly not out to get anyone. 

Some insight into how we thought of the Tweets as far as re-printing rights:  I do believe you own the rights to the tweet; however, I also believe by posting there is an implied desire to reach the widest number of people with that tweet.  Many posts are re-tweeted several times if people like them.  This is, perhaps another way to look at a re-tweet.

Again - we&#039;re searching for ways to continue engaging and growing our reach with Calgary readers.  We want to be cutting edge when we can, and continue to provide a package that goes where our competition doesn&#039;t.  

In the end, you were credited with the content - as was the source, Twitter (via logo) for our print version.  I hope that suffices.

We&#039;ll continue to do it as long as we think it&#039;s of value to our readers - and hopefully more people will embrace it and it becomes another mechanism to get debate and comment on relevant issues and topics out in the open and on a bigger stage.

D..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post DJ.  Certainly brings the issue to the forefront, which is always good for finding our bearings on topics like this.</p>
<p>First I just want to say our intent was to reach out and engage Calgarians on Twitter, be relevant and forward-thinking &#8211; and give our readers a voice, which they so often don&#8217;t have in today&#8217;s media.  We wanted to know what Calgarians were tweeting about &#8211; especially the &#8216;hot&#8217; water cooler discussions going on &#8211; and then let other Calgarians know what the Twittersphere in Calgary was on to.</p>
<p>I know you understand there is no malice involved in re-printing in the paper &#8211; we&#8217;re certainly not out to get anyone. </p>
<p>Some insight into how we thought of the Tweets as far as re-printing rights:  I do believe you own the rights to the tweet; however, I also believe by posting there is an implied desire to reach the widest number of people with that tweet.  Many posts are re-tweeted several times if people like them.  This is, perhaps another way to look at a re-tweet.</p>
<p>Again &#8211; we&#8217;re searching for ways to continue engaging and growing our reach with Calgary readers.  We want to be cutting edge when we can, and continue to provide a package that goes where our competition doesn&#8217;t.  </p>
<p>In the end, you were credited with the content &#8211; as was the source, Twitter (via logo) for our print version.  I hope that suffices.</p>
<p>We&#8217;ll continue to do it as long as we think it&#8217;s of value to our readers &#8211; and hopefully more people will embrace it and it becomes another mechanism to get debate and comment on relevant issues and topics out in the open and on a bigger stage.</p>
<p>D..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darren Krause</title>
		<link>http://djkelly.ca/2009/09/my-tweet-was-in-the-paper-wait-am-i-okay-with-that/#comment-760</link>
		<dc:creator>Darren Krause</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 18:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://djkelly.ca/?p=239#comment-760</guid>
		<description>Great post DJ.  Certainly brings the issue to the forefront, which is always good for finding our bearings on topics like this.

First I just want to say our intent was to reach out and engage Calgarians on Twitter, be relevant and forward-thinking - and give our readers a voice, which they so often don&#039;t have in today&#039;s media.  We wanted to know what Calgarians were tweeting about - especially the &#039;hot&#039; water cooler discussions going on - and then let other Calgarians know what the Twittersphere in Calgary was on to.

I know you understand there is no malice involved in re-printing in the paper - we&#039;re certainly not out to get anyone. 

Some insight into how we thought of the Tweets as far as re-printing rights:  I do believe you own the rights to the tweet; however, I also believe by posting there is an implied desire to reach the widest number of people with that tweet.  Many posts are re-tweeted several times if people like them.  This is, perhaps another way to look at a re-tweet.

Again - we&#039;re searching for ways to continue engaging and growing our reach with Calgary readers.  We want to be cutting edge when we can, and continue to provide a package that goes where our competition doesn&#039;t.  

In the end, you were credited with the content - as was the source, Twitter (via logo) for our print version.  I hope that suffices.

We&#039;ll continue to do it as long as we think it&#039;s of value to our readers - and hopefully more people will embrace it and it becomes another mechanism to get debate and comment on relevant issues and topics out in the open and on a bigger stage.

D..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post DJ.  Certainly brings the issue to the forefront, which is always good for finding our bearings on topics like this.</p>
<p>First I just want to say our intent was to reach out and engage Calgarians on Twitter, be relevant and forward-thinking &#8211; and give our readers a voice, which they so often don&#8217;t have in today&#8217;s media.  We wanted to know what Calgarians were tweeting about &#8211; especially the &#8216;hot&#8217; water cooler discussions going on &#8211; and then let other Calgarians know what the Twittersphere in Calgary was on to.</p>
<p>I know you understand there is no malice involved in re-printing in the paper &#8211; we&#8217;re certainly not out to get anyone. </p>
<p>Some insight into how we thought of the Tweets as far as re-printing rights:  I do believe you own the rights to the tweet; however, I also believe by posting there is an implied desire to reach the widest number of people with that tweet.  Many posts are re-tweeted several times if people like them.  This is, perhaps another way to look at a re-tweet.</p>
<p>Again &#8211; we&#8217;re searching for ways to continue engaging and growing our reach with Calgary readers.  We want to be cutting edge when we can, and continue to provide a package that goes where our competition doesn&#8217;t.  </p>
<p>In the end, you were credited with the content &#8211; as was the source, Twitter (via logo) for our print version.  I hope that suffices.</p>
<p>We&#8217;ll continue to do it as long as we think it&#8217;s of value to our readers &#8211; and hopefully more people will embrace it and it becomes another mechanism to get debate and comment on relevant issues and topics out in the open and on a bigger stage.</p>
<p>D..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ginger</title>
		<link>http://djkelly.ca/2009/09/my-tweet-was-in-the-paper-wait-am-i-okay-with-that/#comment-395</link>
		<dc:creator>Ginger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 17:59:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://djkelly.ca/?p=239#comment-395</guid>
		<description>This is totally cool, but I completely understand your concerns. I&#039;m trying to figure out how I would feel if I was in your shoes right now. Even though I&#039;ve read the terms of service, I do have my Twitter feed public and I would be partly excited I would still feel a bit odd about it. I would, at least, want a heads up (I think). Then it makes me wonder: what if the tweet itself was something to be easily taken out of context and completely sabotaging any e-rep you may have, if that even exists. A respectability, I suppose.

Definitely an interesting topic. I am going to think about this some more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is totally cool, but I completely understand your concerns. I&#8217;m trying to figure out how I would feel if I was in your shoes right now. Even though I&#8217;ve read the terms of service, I do have my Twitter feed public and I would be partly excited I would still feel a bit odd about it. I would, at least, want a heads up (I think). Then it makes me wonder: what if the tweet itself was something to be easily taken out of context and completely sabotaging any e-rep you may have, if that even exists. A respectability, I suppose.</p>
<p>Definitely an interesting topic. I am going to think about this some more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ginger</title>
		<link>http://djkelly.ca/2009/09/my-tweet-was-in-the-paper-wait-am-i-okay-with-that/#comment-759</link>
		<dc:creator>Ginger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 17:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://djkelly.ca/?p=239#comment-759</guid>
		<description>This is totally cool, but I completely understand your concerns. I&#039;m trying to figure out how I would feel if I was in your shoes right now. Even though I&#039;ve read the terms of service, I do have my Twitter feed public and I would be partly excited I would still feel a bit odd about it. I would, at least, want a heads up (I think). Then it makes me wonder: what if the tweet itself was something to be easily taken out of context and completely sabotaging any e-rep you may have, if that even exists. A respectability, I suppose.

Definitely an interesting topic. I am going to think about this some more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is totally cool, but I completely understand your concerns. I&#8217;m trying to figure out how I would feel if I was in your shoes right now. Even though I&#8217;ve read the terms of service, I do have my Twitter feed public and I would be partly excited I would still feel a bit odd about it. I would, at least, want a heads up (I think). Then it makes me wonder: what if the tweet itself was something to be easily taken out of context and completely sabotaging any e-rep you may have, if that even exists. A respectability, I suppose.</p>
<p>Definitely an interesting topic. I am going to think about this some more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

